Ford v. Chase

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ford v. Chase

137 A.D. 927

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1910·Published

Opinion

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the indebtedness in question was contracted prior to the time when the defendants became stockholders of the corporation, withiq the meaning of section 56 of the Stock Corporation Law.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the indebtedness in question was contracted prior to the time when the defendants became stockholders of the corporation, withiq the meaning of section 56 of the Stock Corporation Law.

Footnotes

Ford v. Chase, 137 A.D. 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

137 A.D. 927 (Ford v. Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.