Ford v. Barnacle Bill's Seafood Galley, Inc.

350 So. 2d 838
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 20, 1977
DocketNo. EE-6
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 350 So. 2d 838 (Ford v. Barnacle Bill's Seafood Galley, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ford v. Barnacle Bill's Seafood Galley, Inc., 350 So. 2d 838 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ford’s appeal seeks review of a final judgment for damages in favor of Barnacle Bill, appellant’s tenant, resulting from delay caused by Ford in repairing the leased premises following storm damage. Having considered the errors alleged by appellant pertaining to the admission of appellee’s exhibits, denying appellant’s motion for new trial and motion for remittitur, and the admission into evidence of appellant’s exhibit, we find no error.

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BARNACLE BILL'S SEAFOOD v. Ford
453 So. 2d 165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
350 So. 2d 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-barnacle-bills-seafood-galley-inc-fladistctapp-1977.