Ford v. Barnacle Bill's Seafood Galley, Inc.

350 So. 2d 838
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 1977·No. No. EE-6·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ford’s appeal seeks review of a final judgment for damages in favor of Barnacle Bill, appellant’s tenant, resulting from delay caused by Ford in repairing the leased premises following storm damage. Having considered the errors alleged by appellant pertaining to the admission of appellee’s exhibits, denying appellant’s motion for new trial and motion for remittitur, and the admission into evidence of appellant’s exhibit, we find no error.

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. Barnacle Bill's Seafood Galley, Inc., 350 So. 2d 838 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

350 So. 2d 838 (Ford v. Barnacle Bill's Seafood Galley, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BARNACLE BILL'S SEAFOOD v. Ford
453 So. 2d 165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)