Ford v. Baird
2 Pin. 242, 1 Chand. 212
This text of 2 Pin. 242 (Ford v. Baird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ford v. Baird, 2 Pin. 242, 1 Chand. 212 (Wis. 1849).
Opinion
This was a judgment by default in the court below, and we do not discover any such error in the record as will warrant its reversal, Though the special count may perhaps be bad, the common counts are unobjectionable, and are sufficient to support the judgment; and, after verdict or default, this is enough.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Pin. 242, 1 Chand. 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-baird-wis-1849.