Ford v. Babcock
This text of 1 Denio 158 (Ford v. Babcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If the marine court of the city of New-York may proceed by attachment, (a point‘I have not looked at,) still this plea is palpably bad. That Court has but a special and limited jurisdiction, both as to cases and parties ; and whoever sets up its authority, in a case instituted by [159]*159himself, must show that the case was one of which the court had complete jurisdiction. To this rule there is no exception. (Jones v. Reed, 1 John. Cas. 20 ; Service v. Hermance, 1 John. R. 91; Roosevelt v. Kellogg, 20 id. 208.)
This plea was not prepared upon any such principle, nor indeed upon any principle known in the law of special pleading, and is radically vicious.
Judgment for the plaintiff on demurrer, with leave to amend, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Denio 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-babcock-nycterr-1845.