Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Raypo Construction, Inc.

606 So. 2d 1286, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11797, 1992 WL 324656
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1992·No. No. 91-3083·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the guaranty provision of the retail installment contract was not ambiguous and that the trial court erred in permitting parol evidence to vary the terms of the guaranty. See Manufacturers’ Leasing, Ltd. v. Florida Dev. & Attractions, Inc., 330 So.2d 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Raypo Construction, Inc., 606 So. 2d 1286, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11797, 1992 WL 324656 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

606 So. 2d 1286 (Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Raypo Construction, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MANUFACTURERS'LEAS., LTD. v. Florida Dev. & Att., Inc.
330 So. 2d 171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)