Ford Motor Credit Co., L.L.C. v. Sobecki
This text of 2025 Ohio 4994 (Ford Motor Credit Co., L.L.C. v. Sobecki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Ford Motor Credit Co., L.L.C. v. Sobecki, 2025-Ohio-4994.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY
FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, CASE NO. 2025-L-106 L.L.C. d.b.a. LINCOLN AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, Civil Appeal from the Plaintiff-Appellee, Court of Common Pleas
- vs - Trial Court No. 2024 CV 001630 ANTHONY SOBECKI a.k.a. ANTHONY M. SOBECKI a.k.a. TONY M. SOBECKI,
Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Decided: November 3, 2025 Judgment: Appeal dismissed
Michael S. Berkowitz, Suzana Pastor, Paul K. Rode, and Keith D. Weiner, Keith D. Weiner & Associates Co., L.P.A., 1100 Superior Avenue, E., Suite 1100, Cleveland, OH 44114 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
Anthony Sobecki, pro se, 11106 Quail Hollow Drive, Concord, OH 44077 (Defendant- Appellant).
EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.
{¶1} On September 2, 2025, appellant, Anthony Sobecki, pro se, filed an appeal
from a June 30, 2025 entry issued by the Lake County Court of Common Pleas.
{¶2} App.R. 3(A) states that the only jurisdictional requirement for filing a valid
appeal is to file it within the time allowed by App.R. 4. The Supreme Court of Ohio has
indicated that a failure to comply with the time requirements prescribed in App.R. 4(A) is a jurisdictional defect, which is fatal to an appeal. Rives v. Lowes, 2025-Ohio-4530, ¶ 2
(11th Dist.).
{¶3} “Subject to the provisions of App.R. 4(A)(3), a party who wishes to appeal
from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R.
3 within 30 days of that entry.” See App.R. 4(A)(1). Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of
courts to serve the parties with notice of the entry within three days of entering the
judgment upon the journal. If Civ.R. 58(B) service does not occur within three days, the
time to appeal does not begin to run until service is made and noted on the appearance
docket. Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 2005-Ohio-5360, ¶ 24 (6th Dist.).
{¶4} Here, the trial court issued its entry on June 30, 2025, and the clerk of courts
noted on the appearance docket that a copy of the entry was mailed to appellant on July
1, 2025. Hence, pursuant Civ.R. 58(B), the time to appeal began to run from June 30,
2025. The deadline for appellant to file an appeal was July 30, 2025. Thus, appellant’s
September 2, 2025 notice of appeal was untimely.
{¶5} This court is not empowered to extend the time deadline in civil cases.
State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60 (1988); see
also App.R. 14(B).
{¶6} Based upon the foregoing, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely
filed pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1).
ROBERT J. PATTON, P.J.,
MATT LYNCH, J.,
concur.
PAGE 2 OF 3
Case No. 2025-L-106 JUDGMENT ENTRY
For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this court, it is ordered that
this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely filed pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1).
Costs shall be taxed against appellant.
JUDGE EUGENE A. LUCCI
PRESIDING JUDGE ROBERT J. PATTON, concurs
JUDGE MATT LYNCH, concurs
THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES A FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY
A certified copy of this opinion and judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.
PAGE 3 OF 3
Case No. 2025-L-106
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 Ohio 4994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-motor-credit-co-llc-v-sobecki-ohioctapp-2025.