Ford Motor Company v. HALL-EDWARDS

5 So. 3d 786, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2508, 2009 WL 763618
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 25, 2009
Docket3D08-2984, 3D06-1656
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 So. 3d 786 (Ford Motor Company v. HALL-EDWARDS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ford Motor Company v. HALL-EDWARDS, 5 So. 3d 786, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2508, 2009 WL 763618 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for Writ of Certiorari filed by Ford Motor Company asking this Court to quash orders of the trial court granting respondent Joan Hall-Edwards, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lance Crossman Hall’s, Motion to Amend Complaint to Allege Punitive Damages, and enforce its mandate to preclude a claim for punitive damages. We grant the petition because certiorari is the appropriate remedy to determine whether the trial court has conformed to the procedural requirements of section 768.72, Florida Statutes (2008). Accordingly, we remand without prejudice to hold a new hearing on the motion to amend with instructions to provide Ford Motor Company with the statutory notice of the new theory of punitive damages.

Petition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ford Motor Co. v. HALL-EDWARDS
21 So. 3d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 So. 3d 786, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2508, 2009 WL 763618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-motor-company-v-hall-edwards-fladistctapp-2009.