Ford Motor Co. v. Yarborough, Et Vir.

Supreme Court of Florida

Ford Motor Co. v. Yarborough, Et Vir.

189 So. 926, 137 Fla. 309, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1825

DecidedApril 21, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 926 (Ford Motor Co. v. Yarborough, Et Vir.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ford Motor Co. v. Yarborough, Et Vir., 189 So. 926, 137 Fla. 309, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1825 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon authority of the opinion in Ford Motor Company, a corporation, and E. S. DesChamps, Jr., *310 v. Farley F. Floyd, as administrator of the estate of Alice Floyd, decided this term, it is ordered that the judgment s'o far as it relates to E. S. DesChamps, Jr., is hereby affirmed, and as to the Ford Motor Company is to be reversed; one half of the costs of this proceeding to be borne by the defendant in error and one half by the plaintiff in error, E. S. DesChamps, Jr.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford, J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon authority of the opinion in Ford Motor Company, a corporation, and E. S. DesChamps, Jr., *310 v. Farley F. Floyd, as administrator of the estate of Alice Floyd, decided this term, it is ordered that the judgment s'o far as it relates to E. S. DesChamps, Jr., is hereby affirmed, and as to the Ford Motor Company is to be reversed; one half of the costs of this proceeding to be borne by the defendant in error and one half by the plaintiff in error, E. S. DesChamps, Jr.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford, J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 So. 926, 137 Fla. 309, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-motor-co-v-yarborough-et-vir-fla-1939.