Ford Motor Co. v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court

Ford Motor Co. v. Pennsylvania

324 U.S. 827, 65 S. Ct. 857, 89 L. Ed. 1394, 1945 U.S. LEXIS 2337

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 12, 1945

DocketNo. 872

StatusPublished

This text of 324 U.S. 827 (Ford Motor Co. v. Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ford Motor Co. v. Pennsylvania, 324 U.S. 827, 65 S. Ct. 857, 89 L. Ed. 1394, 1945 U.S. LEXIS 2337 (1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107, 165; Educational Films Corp. v. Ward, 282 U. S. 379; Ford Motor Co. v. Beauchamp, 308 U. S. 331; Butler Bros. v. McColgan, 315 U. S. 501; (2) Kansas City, M. & B. R. Co. v. Stiles, 242 U. S. 111; Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Wisconsin, 247 U. S. 132; (3) Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U. S. 319, 322-323.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107, 165; Educational Films Corp. v. Ward, 282 U. S. 379; Ford Motor Co. v. Beauchamp, 308 U. S. 331; Butler Bros. v. McColgan, 315 U. S. 501; (2) Kansas City, M. & B. R. Co. v. Stiles, 242 U. S. 111; Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Wisconsin, 247 U. S. 132; (3) Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U. S. 319, 322-323.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

324 U.S. 827, 65 S. Ct. 857, 89 L. Ed. 1394, 1945 U.S. LEXIS 2337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-motor-co-v-pennsylvania-scotus-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack