Ford Motor Co. v. Floyd
189 So. 925, 137 Fla. 308, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1824
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ford Motor Co. v. Floyd. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 Fla. 301 →
Opinion
Upon authority of the opinion in Ford *309 Motor Company, a corporation, and E. S. DesChamps, Jr., v. Farley F. Floyd, as administrator of the estate of Alice Floyd, decided this term, it is ordered that the judgment s'o far as it relates to E. S. DesChamps, Jr., is hereby affirmed, and as to' the Ford Motor Company is to be reversed; one half of the costs of this proceeding to be borne by the defendant in error and one half by the plaintiff in error, E. S. DesChamps, Jr.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ford Motor Co. v. Floyd, 189 So. 925, 137 Fla. 308, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1824 (Fla. 1939).
189 So. 925 (Ford Motor Co. v. Floyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.