Ford Motor Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.
216 N.E.2d 44, 6 Ohio St. 2d 114, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 134, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 349
Opinion
The Ford Motor Company was not making actual use of the truck and was not an insured under Continental’s policy issued to Clifton, at the time of the accident. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on authority of Travelers Ins. Co. v. Buckeye Union Casualty Co., 172 Ohio St. 507, and Buckeye Union Casualty Co. v. Illinois National Ins. Co., 2 Ohio St. 2d 59.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ford Motor Co. v. Continental Casualty Co., 216 N.E.2d 44, 6 Ohio St. 2d 114, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 134, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 349 (Ohio 1966).
216 N.E.2d 44 (Ford Motor Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beverly A. Giles v. Sun Pipe Line Company, Defendant-Third Party v. Transamerica Insurance Company, Third Party
833 F.2d 1012 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Kurdziel v. Pittsburgh Tube Co.
416 F.2d 882 (Sixth Circuit, 1969)
Helen T. Kurdziel, of the Estate of Franklin C. Rosebrock, Deceased v. Pittsburgh Tube Company, Third-Party v. Travelers Insurance Company, Third-Party
416 F.2d 882 (Third Circuit, 1969)
Gary Hake v. Eagle Picher Company, Third-Party and v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company, Third-Party Third-Party and v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd., Third-Party And
406 F.2d 893 (Third Circuit, 1969)
Hake v. Eagle Picher Co.
406 F.2d 893 (Seventh Circuit, 1969)
Durisek v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
277 F. Supp. 350 (N.D. Ohio, 1967)
Hake v. Eagle Picher Co.
265 F. Supp. 331 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1966)