Ford, Frances Rosalez
This text of Ford, Frances Rosalez (Ford, Frances Rosalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PD-0499-15 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
FRANCES R, FORD, ^Uftl UJ- CRWHNAt APPRl_ THE STATE OF TEXAS Abel Acosfra, Clerf' Appellee. From the Fourth Court of Appeals of Texas No. 04-14-00025-CR HLED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Trial Court Cause No. 2011-CR-2986 "^' ^120*5 The Honorable 227th Judicial District Court A. ,A Abel Acosta, Clerk Bexar County, Texas MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S PRO SE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW Appellant FRANCES R. FORD, pro se, respectfully moves this Court for a 90-day extension of time under Rule 10.5(b)(3), Tex.R.App.Pro., to file her pro se petition for discretionary review. Appellant submits the following facts relied on to support the need for this extension of time: Antonio, Texas, affirmed Appellant's judgement of conviction on April 1, 2015. Ford v.. State, (No. 04-14-00025-CR, April 1, 2015)(Unpublished). B. Appellate counsel did not file a rehearing or en banc. C Appellant's current deadline for filing her petition for discretionary review is May 2, 2015. affirmation until mid-April. Due to her current indigent status, Appellant cannot afford retained counsel to assist her with the preparation of a petition for discretionary review, and will proceed pro se. This additional time request is necessary because of the limited time restraints of the use of the prison law library, and the extension of time is necessary to conduct further caselaw and statutory research to support the claims for review urged in the petition for discretionary review. This request is not for the purpose of delay, but is based on legitimate grounds. time. A 90-day extension is not unreasonable due to the fact that Appellant is serving a LIFE sentence, and the need for the additional time will serve to assist in submitting a proper petition for discretionary review. This extension will not create a hardship or prejudice to the State or the Court[s]. (2) Prayer Appellant respectfully prays the Court to grant the above request for extension of time and enter an order extending the time for 90-days to file a petition for discretionary review in this cause, making the petition due on or before July 31, 2015. Appellant further prays for any other relief the Court deems relevant to the disposition of this Motion. Respectfully submitted, . Ford, Appei; TDCJ-CID # 1916749/Crain Unit 1401 State School Rd., Gatesville, TX 76599 Certificate of Service for Extension of Time to the parties for the State by placing a copy in the U.S. Postal service, on this the 22nd day of April, 2015, first-class postage prepaid. nranc.es R- Ford, Appellant (3)A. The Fourth Judicial District Court of Appeals of San
D. Appellant requests a 90-day extension of time.
E. Appellant did not receive notice of the Court of Appeals'
F. This is Appellant's first request for an extension of
I hereby certify I have mailed a copy of the foregoing Motion
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ford, Frances Rosalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-frances-rosalez-texapp-2015.