Ford, David Eugene

Opinion

PD-0492-15 FILED IN ;OURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS w-ottott

QsPr-OQK)^ -OC

lJSLJhe,_ —Abel AeostarGlerk-

IJ31PQ|glH/IE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Pc

JSl&O. M.AY~O-H015-s^7rf-

V,„ ^bal-AGostarGlerk-

lh^^kik^^4~Tdla^

Bpn4-—dflpetJL^\/Gt /2d&£03& <£-* lt&U-MiX3£-jM°u UMzMkttL.

^hLHi^QDUMJh^/ 6Gta£_ ; fcr^V Mot-Ion &>r £k\v*>mi_cli^JTim&^Jh--6k mtitix/jo fz>J^ P^c^k(M^w___^-tofet^ — — ~

VW OPvat V \CW» EbVtoteiwc^,

X.

mfcve (KA-fVtPMf Ujcju? CCflqufck^Ofl_J(W l_\^^^D-V^i^--CQa<lt. ,.q £ ^\m^W\ ^UAV^ l fcftt? n^ \Vv« o%*m*. o £ fl^yo^MA RpVckxuH mAtea^-f ^e^tt—^_Cky^g JV^UMr.ffisH3 gKtk*—

IjL3GL^__ofeL«yvei__aia-J^te.iMfl^__ffl<3^l^-

"lw Qic&ri AeatAm W -fiUw) VW peVtfw> -fa OcytJ-nMK •/-

J1L_.

-fetfciKDlVlft -£mfc'. Qe\i\rCMe/ &VO-r> /1&-j iwforweJ S^Uie? decision

2Z*^P& -

"TDcv- t/)^ luiffiHI. £bLihz&,^^AJJ43l&-/