Ford (Damien) Vs. State
This text of Ford (Damien) Vs. State (Ford (Damien) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREMF COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DAM I EN KYTR ELL FORD, No. 82728 Appellant, vs. MLE THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. APR 2 3 2021 EUZAB 11 A. BROWN PREME COURT
ORDE1? DISMISSING APPEAL BY E TY CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a "motion seeking successive petition authorization." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a "motion seeking successive petition authorization," this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 3/19, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
p ok arragurre
44,143,G4,-12 , J. k...1Z1M/AD Stiglich Silver
cc: Hmi. Tierra Danielle jones. District Judge Damien Kytrell Ford Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
IM 1947A MVP
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ford (Damien) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-damien-vs-state-nev-2021.