Ford (Damien) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 2021·No. 82728·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREMF COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DAM I EN KYTR ELL FORD, No. 82728 Appellant,

vs. MLE THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent. APR 2 3 2021 EUZAB 11 A. BROWN

PREME COURT

ORDE1? DISMISSING APPEAL BY E TY CLERK

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a "motion seeking successive petition authorization." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a "motion seeking successive petition authorization," this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 3/19, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

p

ok arragurre

44,143,G4,-12 , J. k...1Z1M/AD Stiglich Silver

cc: Hmi. Tierra Danielle jones. District Judge Damien Kytrell Ford Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

IM 1947A MVP

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford (Damien) Vs. State, (Neb. 2021).

Ford (Damien) Vs. State (Ford (Damien) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)