Forcinal v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
This text of 135 A.2d 746 (Forcinal v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
This appeal comes before us from the refusal of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, en banc, to remove a compulsory nonsuit entered by the trial judge. After the introduction of plaintiffs evidence the trial judge entered the nonsuit because she found the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
No useful purpose would be served by a detailed recital of the facts presented herein. After a complete review of the record we find no error in the determination of the trial judge or the refusal of the court en banc to remove the nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 A.2d 746, 390 Pa. 421, 1957 Pa. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forcinal-v-pittsburgh-railways-co-pa-1957.