Forcinal v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

135 A.2d 746, 390 Pa. 421, 1957 Pa. LEXIS 299
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 11, 1957
DocketAppeal, No. 166
StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.2d 746 (Forcinal v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forcinal v. Pittsburgh Railways Co., 135 A.2d 746, 390 Pa. 421, 1957 Pa. LEXIS 299 (Pa. 1957).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal comes before us from the refusal of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, en banc, to remove a compulsory nonsuit entered by the trial judge. After the introduction of plaintiffs evidence the trial judge entered the nonsuit because she found the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

No useful purpose would be served by a detailed recital of the facts presented herein. After a complete review of the record we find no error in the determination of the trial judge or the refusal of the court en banc to remove the nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.2d 746, 390 Pa. 421, 1957 Pa. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forcinal-v-pittsburgh-railways-co-pa-1957.