Forcina v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Forcina v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

57 A.D.2d 915, 395 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12157

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 915 (Forcina v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forcina v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 57 A.D.2d 915, 395 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to declare that the defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company is obligated to defend plaintiffs in a certain action brought against them, the said defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 23, 1976, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements payable to plaintiffs-respondents by appellant. On the record presented, an issue of fact exists as to whether ownership of the vehicle in issue was transferred from plaintiff June C. Forcina to her coplaintiff, Alexander R. Forcina. If plaintiffs can establish that ownership was not transferred, appellant would remain liable on its insurance policy. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to declare that the defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company is obligated to defend plaintiffs in a certain action brought against them, the said defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 23, 1976, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements payable to plaintiffs-respondents by appellant. On the record presented, an issue of fact exists as to whether ownership of the vehicle in issue was transferred from plaintiff June C. Forcina to her coplaintiff, Alexander R. Forcina. If plaintiffs can establish that ownership was not transferred, appellant would remain liable on its insurance policy. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 915, 395 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forcina-v-hartford-accident-indemnity-co-nyappdiv-1977.