Forcheimer & Co. v. Mayo

16 Fla. 676
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 16 Fla. 676 (Forcheimer & Co. v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forcheimer & Co. v. Mayo, 16 Fla. 676 (Fla. 1878).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Yan Yalkenburgh

delivered the opinion of the court.

This- was an action of replevin, brought by Forcheimer & Co. against Mayo, to recover 222 pine saw logs. The cause was tried before a jury, and the verdict was for the defendant.

Plaintiffs moved for new trial, upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and the law. This motion was denied, and judgment against the plaintiffs for costs was awarded. From this judgment the plaintiffs bring their appeal.

No exceptions to the rulings of the court on the trial, or ;to the charge to the jury were noted. It was a question of ■ fact as to which of the parties were owners of the property. The evidence was conflicting, and the jury have determined - the question. There is no suggestion of undue influence upon, or improper motives influencing the jury.

Upon the same principles and rules which control the decision in the case of Mayo, appellant, against Forcheimer [677]*677& Co., appellees, decided at this term, this judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foster v. Thornton
160 So. 490 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Holland v. State ex rel. Duval County
23 Fla. 123 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1887)
Broward v. Roche
21 Fla. 465 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Fla. 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forcheimer-co-v-mayo-fla-1878.