Forbush v. Forbush

97 A.D.2d 946
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 4, 1983·No. Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The order of May 27, 1983 is modified by striking the ninth decretal paragraph.. Special Term abused its discretion by directing that defendant’s deposition be taken before plaintiff was required to answer the fault interrogatories. By failing to reschedule defendant’s deposition after the automatic stay was lifted, plaintiff waived his right to demand a priority in discovery and defendant’s priority was reinstated (see Clifton Steel Corp. v County of Monroe Public Works Dept., 1A AD2d 715). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — strike interrogatories.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forbush v. Forbush, 97 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

97 A.D.2d 946 (Forbush v. Forbush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forbush v. Forbush
107 A.D.2d 375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)