Forbright Bank v. Contour PropCo 1735 S Mission, LLC
This text of Forbright Bank v. Contour PropCo 1735 S Mission, LLC (Forbright Bank v. Contour PropCo 1735 S Mission, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FORBRIGHT BANK f/k/a Congressional Case No.: 23-cv-00931-JAH-NLS Bank, a Maryland chartered bank, 12 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY Plaintiff, 13 CLOSING CASE v. 14 CONTOUR PROPCO 1735 S MISSION, 15 LLC, a Delaware limited liability 16 company, CONTOUR OPCO 1735 S MISSION, LLC, a Delaware limited 17 liability company, UMB BANK, N.A., a 18 national banking association, ZB, N.A. D/B/A NATIONAL BANK OF 19 ARIZONA, a national banking 20 association, PRO-VIGIL, INC., a Texas corporation, and DOES 1-12, the last 21 twelve names being fictitious and 22 unknown to Plaintiff, the persons or parties intended being the tenants, 23 occupants, persons, or entities, if any, 24 having or claiming an interest in or lien upon the mortgaged premises described in 25 the complaint, 26 Defendants. 27 28 1 On May 24, 2023, Defendants Contour PropCo 1735 S Mission, LLC, a Delaware 2 limited liability company, and Contour OpCo 1735 S Mission, LLC’s (collectively, 3 || “Defendants’’) filed a notice of bankruptcy and automatic stay based upon the filing of the 4 || bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada. (ECF 5 10). The Court stayed the matter pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362. (ECF No. 12). In order 6 ||to manage its docket, the Court HEREBY DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to 7 || ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case until the automatic stay in the parallel 8 || bankruptcy proceeding is lifted. See Sarkar v. Garland, 39 F.4th 611, 618 (9th Cir. 2022). 9 ||The case shall be restored to the trial docket upon motion of a party following the 10 termination or expiration of the Bankruptcy Court's automatic stay to allow this action to 11 ||proceed to disposition. This Order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this 12 || litigation in any manner. 13 IT ISSO ORDERED. 14 || DATED: August 28, 2024
16 JOHN A. HOUSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Forbright Bank v. Contour PropCo 1735 S Mission, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forbright-bank-v-contour-propco-1735-s-mission-llc-casd-2024.