Forbes v. Virginia Beach Police Department

435 F. App'x 278
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2011·No. No. 11-6569·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alfred L. Forbes, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failing to pay the filing fee and failing to apply to proceed without prepayment of the fee under 18 U.S.C. § 1915(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Forbes v. Virginia Beach Police Dep’t, No. 2:11-cv-00007-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Apr. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forbes v. Virginia Beach Police Department, 435 F. App'x 278 (4th Cir. 2011).

435 F. App'x 278 (Forbes v. Virginia Beach Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related