Forbes v. Sunset Park Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Forbes v. Sunset Park Co.

117 So. 897, 96 Fla. 365

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 1, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order and decree herein and briefs and argument of *366 counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seén and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the .prehiises it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order and decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed upon authority of Culclasure v. Consolidated Bond & Mortgage Co., Fla. 114 So. R. 540.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order and decree herein and briefs and argument of *366 counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seén and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the .prehiises it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order and decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed upon authority of Culclasure v. Consolidated Bond & Mortgage Co., Fla. 114 So. R. 540.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.

Forbes v. Sunset Park Co., 117 So. 897, 96 Fla. 365 (Fla. 1928).

Pincite

117 So. 897 (Forbes v. Sunset Park Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.