Forbes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Forbes v. State

307 S.W.2d 92, 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2815

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 20, 1957

DocketNo. 29266

StatusPublished

This text of 307 S.W.2d 92 (Forbes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forbes v. State, 307 S.W.2d 92, 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2815 (Tex. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The offense is unlawfully transporting an alcoholic beverage in a dry area; the punishment was a fine of $200.

In the absence of statement of facts, we are unable to determine whether the motion for a directed verdict, the requested charge, or the objection to the court’s charge, as presented in his bills of exception, reflect error.

The proceedings appearing regular and no reversible error being apparent, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The offense is unlawfully transporting an alcoholic beverage in a dry area; the punishment was a fine of $200.

In the absence of statement of facts, we are unable to determine whether the motion for a directed verdict, the requested charge, or the objection to the court’s charge, as presented in his bills of exception, reflect error.

The proceedings appearing regular and no reversible error being apparent, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 S.W.2d 92, 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forbes-v-state-texcrimapp-1957.