Forbes v. Oaks

2 Abb. Pr. 120
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Abb. Pr. 120 (Forbes v. Oaks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forbes v. Oaks, 2 Abb. Pr. 120 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1855).

Opinion

Cleeke, J.

The general impression is, that no security is necessary on appeals from orders; the words “in like manner” in section 349, being synonymous with-“also,” besides signifying the branches of the court from which and to which the appeal [121]*121lies, having no reference to security. If, therefore, no security is provided for, that appeal does not per se stay proceedings merely by filing security as in section 348, which expressly states that giving security shall have that effect.

The stay in my opinion must in all cases be obtained by special direction of a judge when the appeal is pursuant to section 349.

I have a discretion to grant a stay in this case. I do not, however, consider it a proper case for a stay. It would be essential, sooner or later, to take an account, and the reference may as well proceed now for that purpose as at any future period.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs to plaintiff, to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoyt v. Terwilliger
12 Abb. Pr. 129 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Abb. Pr. 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forbes-v-oaks-nysupct-1855.