Forbes v. New York Life Insurance
59 N.E. 636, 178 Mass. 139
Opinion
The court had power of its own motion to order the verdict to be set aside. Pub. Sts. c. 153, § 6. Ellis v. Ginsburg, 163 Mass. 143, 146. It is not necessary to consider St. 1897, c. 472, for the reason that no questions or issues were submitted to the jury.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Forbes v. New York Life Insurance, 59 N.E. 636, 178 Mass. 139 (Mass. 1901).
59 N.E. 636 (Forbes v. New York Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mealey v. Super Curline Hair Wave Corp.
173 N.E.2d 84 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1961)
Commonwealth v. Rollins
136 N.E. 360 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
McKinley v. Warren
105 N.E. 990 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Stebbins v. Martin
140 N.W. 1029 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)