Forbes v. Forbes

11 La. Ann. 326
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 11 La. Ann. 326 (Forbes v. Forbes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forbes v. Forbes, 11 La. Ann. 326 (La. 1856).

Opinion

Spoffokd, J.

The ends of justice seem to require that this cause should be remanded for further evidence.

It is admitted of record that the appellants are creditors of the community of acquests and gains, formerly existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, in the sum of $1000, and it seems that the community is insolvent.

The legal presumption is that the slave bought by the plaintiff pending the community of acquests is community property. The unsupported declaration in the act of sale that the purchase money was given to her by her father cannot conclude the appellants, who were strangers to the act.

It is, therefore, ordered and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be reversed, and that this cause be remanded for a new trial according to law, the costs of appeal to be paid by the plaintiff and appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ory Bros. v. Muller
128 So. 903 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Fortson v. Moseke
7 La. App. 131 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
In re Estate of Foster
4 Coffey 33 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 La. Ann. 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forbes-v-forbes-la-1856.