Forbes v. Finkelstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Forbes v. Finkelstein

8 A.D.2d 799, 188 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7835

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 799 (Forbes v. Finkelstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forbes v. Finkelstein, 8 A.D.2d 799, 188 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

The order entered at Special Term on January 14, 1959, is modified to restore items 24, 28, 29 and 38, and to delete the phrase, “ are allowed for the period after May 24, 1952.” As modified, the order is otherwise affirmed on the facts and on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with [800]*800costs to the appellant. In modifying the order, we are not passing on the various Statutes of Limitations which may be applicable. That problem is one for the trial court. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Prank, McNally and Stevens, J J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The order entered at Special Term on January 14, 1959, is modified to restore items 24, 28, 29 and 38, and to delete the phrase, “ are allowed for the period after May 24, 1952.” As modified, the order is otherwise affirmed on the facts and on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with [800]*800costs to the appellant. In modifying the order, we are not passing on the various Statutes of Limitations which may be applicable. That problem is one for the trial court. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Prank, McNally and Stevens, J J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 799, 188 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forbes-v-finkelstein-nyappdiv-1959.