Forbes v. Evans

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Forbes v. Evans

100 A. 943, 256 Pa. 586, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 664

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 26, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 250

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A. 943 (Forbes v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forbes v. Evans, 100 A. 943, 256 Pa. 586, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 664 (Pa. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The auditor distributing the fund in court rightly awarded the proceeds of the sheriff’s sale to the Forbes execution. On it the goods and chattels were seized on April 28,1915. The sheriff’s return is that he sold them on it. It was unquestionably the first lien upon them, and the sheriff’s return to the second writ was that he [590]*590had sold them subject to the prior writ. Under the undisputed facts in the case the conclusion of the auditor and the learned court below was unquestionably correct.

Decree affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The auditor distributing the fund in court rightly awarded the proceeds of the sheriff’s sale to the Forbes execution. On it the goods and chattels were seized on April 28,1915. The sheriff’s return is that he sold them on it. It was unquestionably the first lien upon them, and the sheriff’s return to the second writ was that he [590]*590had sold them subject to the prior writ. Under the undisputed facts in the case the conclusion of the auditor and the learned court below was unquestionably correct.

Decree affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A. 943, 256 Pa. 586, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forbes-v-evans-pa-1917.