Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/FORBES, III v. Par Ten Group, Inc.

FORBES, III v. Par Ten Group, Inc.

402 S.E.2d 824, 328 N.C. 89
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 10, 1991
Docket477P90
StatusPublished

This text of 402 S.E.2d 824 (FORBES, III v. Par Ten Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FORBES, III v. Par Ten Group, Inc., 402 S.E.2d 824, 328 N.C. 89 (N.C. 1991).

Opinion

402 S.E.2d 824 (1991)
328 N.C. 89

Ernest T. FORBES, III, David J. Drum and wife, Dorothy H. Drum, H.B. Stroup, Jr., and wife, Louise P. Stroup, et al
v.
The PAR TEN GROUP, INC., the Property Shop, Inc., Jan C. Mansson, William R. Lewis, Douglas R. Bebber, George W. Matthews.

No. 477P90.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 10, 1991.

Harold K. Bennett, Ashville, for several defendants.

James Gary Rowe and Patricia L. Arcuri, Ashville, for plaintiffs.

Richmond G. Bernhardt, Jr., Greensboro, for NCAR.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Several Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of January 1991."

NCAR's motion for Leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Dismissed as moot. By order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of January 1991."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 S.E.2d 824, 328 N.C. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forbes-iii-v-par-ten-group-inc-nc-1991.