Foraker v. Foraker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Foraker v. Foraker

245 A.D.2d 1122, 666 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13943

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order of Family Court awarding custody of the parties’ two children to petitioner mother. We reject his [1123]*1123contention that the court erred in failing to award joint custody. Joint custody should not be imposed on parents such as these who are unable to get along (see, Braiman v Braiman, 44 NY2d 584, 589-590; Matter of Buffy E. v Lance C., 227 AD2d 903, 904). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Klim, J.—Custody.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order of Family Court awarding custody of the parties’ two children to petitioner mother. We reject his [1123]*1123contention that the court erred in failing to award joint custody. Joint custody should not be imposed on parents such as these who are unable to get along (see, Braiman v Braiman, 44 NY2d 584, 589-590; Matter of Buffy E. v Lance C., 227 AD2d 903, 904). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Klim, J.—Custody.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Foraker v. Foraker, 245 A.D.2d 1122, 666 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13943 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

245 A.D.2d 1122 (Foraker v. Foraker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related