Foraker v. Foraker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Foraker v. Foraker

245 A.D.2d 1122, 666 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13943

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 1122 (Foraker v. Foraker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foraker v. Foraker, 245 A.D.2d 1122, 666 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13943 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order of Family Court awarding custody of the parties’ two children to petitioner mother. We reject his [1123]*1123contention that the court erred in failing to award joint custody. Joint custody should not be imposed on parents such as these who are unable to get along (see, Braiman v Braiman, 44 NY2d 584, 589-590; Matter of Buffy E. v Lance C., 227 AD2d 903, 904). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Klim, J.—Custody.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order of Family Court awarding custody of the parties’ two children to petitioner mother. We reject his [1123]*1123contention that the court erred in failing to award joint custody. Joint custody should not be imposed on parents such as these who are unable to get along (see, Braiman v Braiman, 44 NY2d 584, 589-590; Matter of Buffy E. v Lance C., 227 AD2d 903, 904). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Klim, J.—Custody.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 1122, 666 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foraker-v-foraker-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack