Foppes v. United States
This text of 154 F. 866 (Foppes v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These are reeds of rattan, from which the outside that is used for seating chairs has been removed, not further manufactured than cut into lengths suitable for whips. Chair cane, or reeds manufactured from rattans or reeds, are dutiable at 10 per cent.; while reeds with other woods, in the rough and not further manufactured than cut ipto lengths, are free. These reeds are not exactly in the rough; and the reeds associated with chair cane do not seem to be confined to chair reeds. These seem to be reeds wrought from rattans, and to be dutiable at 10 per cent, as assessed.
The judgment of the Board of Appraisers is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 F. 866, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foppes-v-united-states-circtsdny-1894.