Foppes v. United States

154 F. 866, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2682
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided May 11, 1894·No. No. 1,098·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

These are reeds of rattan, from which the outside that is used for seating chairs has been removed, not further manufactured than cut into lengths suitable for whips. Chair cane, or reeds manufactured from rattans or reeds, are dutiable at 10 per cent.; while reeds with other woods, in the rough and not further manufactured than cut ipto lengths, are free. These reeds are not exactly in the rough; and the reeds associated with chair cane do not seem to be confined to chair reeds. These seem to be reeds wrought from rattans, and to be dutiable at 10 per cent, as assessed.

The judgment of the Board of Appraisers is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foppes v. United States, 154 F. 866, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2682 (circtsdny 1894).

154 F. 866 (Foppes v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rattan & Cane Co. v. United States
6 Ct. Cust. 1 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1915)
United States v. Winter
4 Ct. Cust. 522 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1913)