Foote v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
24 N.Y.S. 1140, 70 Hun 598, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 935
Opinion
The question involved having been previously decided by the general term, (12 N. Y. Supp. 516,) the judgment should be affirmed,with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foote v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co., 24 N.Y.S. 1140, 70 Hun 598, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 935 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
24 N.Y.S. 1140 (Foote v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Foote v. Manhattan Railway Co.
12 N.Y.S. 516 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)