Foote v. Metropolitan Elevated R. R.
77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598
This text of 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598 (Foote v. Metropolitan Elevated R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Foote v. Metropolitan Elevated R. R., 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs.—
The question involved having been previously decided by the General Term, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. (See 58 Hun. 478.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Foote v. Manhattan Railway Co.
12 N.Y.S. 516 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foote-v-metropolitan-elevated-r-r-nysupct-1893.