Foote v. Metropolitan Elevated R. R.
77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs.—
The question involved having been previously decided by the General Term, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. (See 58 Hun. 478.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foote v. Metropolitan Elevated R. R., 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598 (Foote v. Metropolitan Elevated R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Foote v. Manhattan Railway Co.
12 N.Y.S. 516 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)