Foote v. Garland

1 S. & M. 95
Mississippi Chancery Courts·Decided December 15, 1843·Published

Opinion

Chancellor.

This is a bill to enforce a specific performance of a bond of indemnity, to which there is a general demurrer. I had occasion to examine the precise question here presented, in the late case of Buckner v. Hamborough, et al., 1 Freeman’s Chancery Reports, 533, in which I held that no relief could be given in a case like the present. I refer to that case, for the authority upon the question, and as containing a full exposition of my views, applicable to the one before me. Let the demurrer be sustained, and the bill dismissed at the costs of the complainant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foote v. Garland, 1 S. & M. 95 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1843).

1 S. & M. 95 (Foote v. Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.