Foote v. Foote

144 A.D.2d 432, 534 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11779

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated November 2, 1979, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Fierro, J.), dated December 2, 1987, which denied her motion for an upward modification of child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find, as did the Supreme Court, that the plaintiff alleged insufficient facts regarding a change of circumstances to justify a hearing, much less an upward modification in child support (see, Nordhauser v Nordhauser, 130 AD2d 561; Hickland v Hickland, 56 AD2d 978).

We have considered the plaintiff’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Fiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foote v. Foote, 144 A.D.2d 432, 534 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

144 A.D.2d 432 (Foote v. Foote) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hickland v. Hickland
56 A.D.2d 978 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Nordhauser v. Nordhauser
130 A.D.2d 561 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)