Foote v. Flood

44 A.D.2d 566, 353 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5521
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 1974·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review a forfeiture of five days’ “good time” credit in the Nassau County Jail, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 26, 1973, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Before petitioner ¡was deprived of five days’ jail time, an inquiry was conducted by the prison officials at which (1) the nature of her offense was explained to her, (2) she was informed of the evidence against her and (3) she was offered a reasonable opportunity to explain her activities. That is all that due process requires (Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F. 2d 178, 198, 203). Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Cohalan, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foote v. Flood, 44 A.D.2d 566, 353 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

44 A.D.2d 566 (Foote v. Flood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Galipo v. Smith
52 A.D.2d 1088 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Leonard v. Regan
52 A.D.2d 1094 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Perry v. Smith
52 A.D.2d 1094 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Amato v. Ward
52 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Lamica v. Smith
52 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Brack v. Reid
52 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)