Foote v. Board of Supervisors
67 Miss. 156
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellant is the equitable assignee of a portion of what is due from the appellee to Gilmore, but does not sustain such relation to the appellee as to entitle him to demand an allowance of his claim and the issuance of a warrant in his favor. Wherefore the mandamus was properly refused.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foote v. Board of Supervisors, 67 Miss. 156 (Mich. 1889).
67 Miss. 156 (Foote v. Board of Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hook v. Bank of Leland
198 So. 594 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1924)