Foot v. Cady

Connecticut Superior Court

Foot v. Cady

1 Root 173

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1790

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1 Root 173 (Foot v. Cady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foot v. Cady, 1 Root 173 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

It may not be done unless he has some written minutes or memorandum to amend by.

Judgment — Manifest error. Every issue in fact joined to the court or jury must be directly answered. That the defendants laid and collected said tax without law and right, is an inference of law; but the most material fact put in issue, viz. that said Oady was one of Mr. Foster’s adherents, the justice has not found, and without which it is impossible to know whether the inference he has made is right or wrong.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

It may not be done unless he has some written minutes or memorandum to amend by.

Judgment — Manifest error. Every issue in fact joined to the court or jury must be directly answered. That the defendants laid and collected said tax without law and right, is an inference of law; but the most material fact put in issue, viz. that said Oady was one of Mr. Foster’s adherents, the justice has not found, and without which it is impossible to know whether the inference he has made is right or wrong.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foot-v-cady-connsuperct-1790.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack