Foos v. Hawes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Foos v. Hawes

28 A.D.2d 966, 283 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 14, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.2d 966 (Foos v. Hawes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foos v. Hawes, 28 A.D.2d 966, 283 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: The papers submitted upon the motion were wholly inadequate and insufficient to establish the right to the relief requested. Furthermore, the highly irregular manner in which this case was handled is completely unexplained. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term granting motion to increase ad damnum clause and transfer cases to Monroe Supreme Court from County Court.) Present — Williams, P. J., Henry, Del Veechio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: The papers submitted upon the motion were wholly inadequate and insufficient to establish the right to the relief requested. Furthermore, the highly irregular manner in which this case was handled is completely unexplained. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term granting motion to increase ad damnum clause and transfer cases to Monroe Supreme Court from County Court.) Present — Williams, P. J., Henry, Del Veechio and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.2d 966, 283 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foos-v-hawes-nyappdiv-1967.