Fooks v. Bailey
This text of 113 A. 717 (Fooks v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This appeal presents the same questions of jurisdiction and title as those decided in the case of Herman I. Powell v. Mamie C. Bailey and others, being No. 83 on the docket of this term. The two appeals were from the same order and were brought before us and heard together on the same record. For the reasons stated in the opinion just filed in No. 33 the order- of the court below will be affirmed also with respect to the present appeal.
Order affirmed, the costs in this Cowt to be paid equally by the appellants and the appellees, and the costs in the Oourt below to be paid out of the proceeds of sale as provided by the order of that Oourt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 A. 717, 138 Md. 176, 1921 Md. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fooks-v-bailey-md-1921.