Food Crafts, Inc. v. Santiago

300 A.2d 2, 1972 Del. LEXIS 236
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided July 13, 1972·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court reversing the action of the Industrial Accident Board on a petition filed by the employer to terminate disability payments.

The Superior Court, in hearing appeals from the Industrial Accident Board, has the sole function to determine whether or not there was substantial competent evidence in the record sufficient to support the findings of the Board. Johnson v. Chrysler Corp., Del.Supr., 213 A.2d 64 (1965). In exercising this review function, the Superior Court should weigh the evidence to determine the sufficiency of it.

The questions raised by the appellant before us are entirely factual in nature. We *3 have read the Opinion of the Court below and agree with it, and accordingly affirm the judgment of the Superior Court on the Opinion below. Santiago v. Food Crafts, Inc., Del.Super., 286 A.2d 762 (1971).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Food Crafts, Inc. v. Santiago, 300 A.2d 2, 1972 Del. LEXIS 236 (Del. 1972).

300 A.2d 2 (Food Crafts, Inc. v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strawbridge & Clothier v. Campbell
492 A.2d 853 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1985)
Brooks v. Chrysler Corp.
405 A.2d 141 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1979)
Phoenix Steel Corp. v. Brinzo
389 A.2d 269 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1978)
Ware v. Sportsman's Cafe, Inc.
303 A.2d 675 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1972)