Fonville v. Irving Poultry Co.

243 A.D. 528
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff in a negligence action from order granting defendants’ motion for a separate and prior trial of the issue raised by the defense of a general release. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. When the settlement was made and the release was given by plaintiff for the comparatively small amount, the plaintiff and her physicians were unaware of the serious physical condition which subsequently developed, presumably as a result of the alleged injuries. Under such conditions, separate trials have not been granted. (McGurty v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co., 172 App. Div. 46; Schoenbaum v. Reimer, 184 id. 944; Romania v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd., 207 id. 861.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 526.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fonville v. Irving Poultry Co., 243 A.D. 528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

243 A.D. 528 (Fonville v. Irving Poultry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mosher v. Mitchell
22 A.D.2d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Van Slyke v. Eleazer
6 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
In re the Estate of Albright
283 A.D. 1082 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Rabin v. Brooklyn Trust Co.
191 Misc. 321 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
Spencer v. Hunt
247 A.D. 503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)