Fontilla v. Office of Personnel Management

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fontilla v. Office of Personnel Management. Read the opinion of the Court — 482 F. App'x 563
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 31, 2012·No. 2012-3013·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

flflniteh $tates QEnurt at Qppealfi for the fennel Qfirmit

CRESENCIO FONTILLA,

Petitioner,

V.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

2012-3013

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. SF0831110050-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The Office of Personnel Management moves for a 34- day extension of time, until February 13, 2012, to file its response brief.

Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FONTILLA v. 0PM 2 FOR THE COURT

3 1 Isl Jan Herbal}: Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Cresencio Fontilla Antonia R. Scares, Esq.

FILED 32 1 US. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JAN 3112012

JAN HUBBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fontilla v. Office of Personnel Management, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Fontilla v. Office of Personnel Management (Fontilla v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.