Fontenot v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Fontenot v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co.

199 So. 2d 915, 250 La. 898, 27 Oil & Gas Rep. 150, 1967 La. LEXIS 2524

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 6, 1967·No. No. 48716·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re: Wallace Fontenot applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 197 So.2d 715.

[899]*899Writ refused. While we have grave doubt that that portion of the opinion of the Court of Appeal dividing the leases horizontal ly is correct, we nevertheless find that, under the facts and circumstances as found by the Court of Appeal, the result reached by that Court is correct.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion a writ should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Wallace Fontenot applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 197 So.2d 715.

[899]*899Writ refused. While we have grave doubt that that portion of the opinion of the Court of Appeal dividing the leases horizontal ly is correct, we nevertheless find that, under the facts and circumstances as found by the Court of Appeal, the result reached by that Court is correct.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion a writ should be granted.

Fontenot v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co., 199 So. 2d 915, 250 La. 898, 27 Oil & Gas Rep. 150, 1967 La. LEXIS 2524 (La. 1967).

Pincite

199 So. 2d 915 (Fontenot v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related