Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.
This text of 798 So. 2d 951 (Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael J. FONTENOT
v.
REDDELL VIDRINE WATER DISTRICT, et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Michael B. Miller, Crowley, Counsel for Applicant.
Sammie M. Henry, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.[*]
The judgment of the court of appeal is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, to render judgment anew after reconciling conflicting rulings in Fontenot v. Vidrine Water District, 00-762 (La.App. 3rd Cir.2/21/01), 780 So.2d 1197 and Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, 01-0026 (La.App. 3rd Cir.7/25/01) ___ So.2d ___, 2001 WL 832975, regarding the interpretation of La. R .S. 23:1201(F).
We order the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, to decide this matter en banc in order to achieve uniformity within the circuit.
NOTES
[*] Retired Judge Robert L. Lobrano, assigned as Associate Justice Pro Tempore, participating in the decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
798 So. 2d 951, 2001 La. LEXIS 2976, 2001 WL 1335028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fontenot-v-reddell-vidrine-water-dist-la-2001.