Fontenot v. Fontenot
334 So. 2d 234, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4225
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fontenot v. Fontenot. Read the opinion of the Court — 339 So. 2d 897 →
Opinion
This appeal was fixed for argument and all attorneys of record were notified. At the time scheduled for argument, the appellant was not present or represented, nor had any brief been filed on behalf of appellant, nor had any motion been filed for continuance.
On authority of Rule VII, Section 5(b), this Court, ex proprio motu, considers said appeal as abandoned; therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be dismissed with prejudice.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fontenot v. Fontenot, 334 So. 2d 234, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4225 (La. Ct. App. 1976).
334 So. 2d 234 (Fontenot v. Fontenot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.