Fontenot, James Lueis
This text of Fontenot, James Lueis (Fontenot, James Lueis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-86,869-03
EX PARTE JAMES LUEIS FONTENOT, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D090817CR IN THE 260TH DISTRICT COURT FROM ORANGE COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the
district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that TDCJ is incorrectly calculating his time credit. Applicant has alleged
facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial
court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The
trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to
obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the record, the trial
court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, 2
it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented
by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE
CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify
this Court of counsel’s name.
The response shall include Applicant’s sentence begin date and his maximum discharge date.
The response shall also state whether Applicant presented a claim to the time credit resolution
system of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and, if so, the date the claim was presented.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether, before filing
this application, Applicant properly exhausted his administrative remedies as required by Section
501.0081(b) of the Government Code. The trial court shall then make findings and conclusions as
to whether TDCJ has correctly calculated Applicant’s time credit. The trial court may make any
other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: November 24, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fontenot, James Lueis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fontenot-james-lueis-texcrimapp-2021.