Fontanez v. St. Barnabas Hospital
This text of 24 A.D.3d 218 (Fontanez v. St. Barnabas Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered June 8, 2005, which denied plaintiffs motion for reargument, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.
The motion court correctly determined that since the issues raised in plaintiffs present motion had been previously litigated and decided, and since plaintiff did not submit any new or additional facts not before the court on the prior occasion, plaintiffs motion, although denominated as one for both reargument and renewal, was, in essence, a motion to reargue. The motion was denied as such, and it is well settled that orders denying reargument are not appealable (see e.g. Rosen v Rosenholc, 303 AD2d 230 [2003]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A.D.3d 218, 804 N.Y.S.2d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fontanez-v-st-barnabas-hospital-nyappdiv-2005.