Fontanez v. Lazarus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fontanez v. Lazarus

68 A.D.3d 558, 889 N.Y.2d 844

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 68 A.D.3d 558 (Fontanez v. Lazarus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fontanez v. Lazarus, 68 A.D.3d 558, 889 N.Y.2d 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In a stipulation so-ordered by the court, any motions by defendants for summary judgment were to be “served and filed” by November 21, 2007, and that while appellant served its motion on November 21, it did not file it until November 30. Accordingly, appellant was required, but failed, to show good cause for the late filing (Corchado v City of New York, 64 AD3d 429 [559]*559[2009]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a stipulation so-ordered by the court, any motions by defendants for summary judgment were to be “served and filed” by November 21, 2007, and that while appellant served its motion on November 21, it did not file it until November 30. Accordingly, appellant was required, but failed, to show good cause for the late filing (Corchado v City of New York, 64 AD3d 429 [559]*559[2009]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.3d 558, 889 N.Y.2d 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fontanez-v-lazarus-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack