Fontanez v. Lazarus
68 A.D.3d 558, 889 N.Y.2d 844
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 2009·Published
Opinion
In a stipulation so-ordered by the court, any motions by defendants for summary judgment were to be “served and filed” by November 21, 2007, and that while appellant served its motion on November 21, it did not file it until November 30. Accordingly, appellant was required, but failed, to show good cause for the late filing (Corchado v City of New York, 64 AD3d 429 [559]*559[2009]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fontanez v. Lazarus, 68 A.D.3d 558, 889 N.Y.2d 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 558 (Fontanez v. Lazarus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Corchado v. City of New York
64 A.D.3d 429 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)