Fontanez v. Coakley

Fourth Circuit

Fontanez v. Coakley

698 F. App'x 150

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2017·No. No. 17-6524, No. 17-6664·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeremy Fontanez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders granting relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and affirming his right to withdraw from the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program at any time, and denying his motion to. clarify. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeremy Fontanez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders granting relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and affirming his right to withdraw from the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program at any time, and denying his motion to. clarify. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Fontanez v. Coakley, 698 F. App'x 150 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

698 F. App'x 150 (Fontanez v. Coakley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related