Fontanella v. Marcucci

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Fontanella v. Marcucci

882 A.2d 670, 275 Conn. 907, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 365

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 12, 2005

DocketSC 17495

StatusPublished

This text of 882 A.2d 670 (Fontanella v. Marcucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fontanella v. Marcucci, 882 A.2d 670, 275 Conn. 907, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 365 (Colo. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the defendants Frank S. Marcucci and John F. Acampora for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 690 (AC 24725), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decide that the plaintiffs legal malpractice claim was timely because the statute of limitations had been tolled?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the defendants Frank S. Marcucci and John F. Acampora for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 690 (AC 24725), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decide that the plaintiffs legal malpractice claim was timely because the statute of limitations had been tolled?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

882 A.2d 670, 275 Conn. 907, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fontanella-v-marcucci-conn-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack