Fontanella v. Marcucci

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Fontanella v. Marcucci

882 A.2d 670, 275 Conn. 907, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 365

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 12, 2005·No. SC 17495·Published

Opinion

The petition by the defendants Frank S. Marcucci and John F. Acampora for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 690 (AC 24725), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decide that the plaintiffs legal malpractice claim was timely because the statute of limitations had been tolled?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the defendants Frank S. Marcucci and John F. Acampora for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 690 (AC 24725), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decide that the plaintiffs legal malpractice claim was timely because the statute of limitations had been tolled?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Fontanella v. Marcucci, 882 A.2d 670, 275 Conn. 907, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 365 (Colo. 2005).

Pincite

882 A.2d 670 (Fontanella v. Marcucci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related